#Dragons 2 cloudjumper free
Feel free to share your thoughts, or anyone else who reads this. The animation style is just noticably different. His hair is darker (and this is most likely because most peoples' hair darkens with age. now they seem normal for someone his age.) (he had like really skinny arms, legs, and neck. His limbs are not overly skinny like the first film. This way he doesn't look so child like any more.) (in the first one his pupils being so small and his eyes so big was a noticable difference, but again I think they just did that because he was a kid and it was different animation. His eyes, yes are smaller and look more real. So the reason he looks so different is most likely the writers wanted to turn him into a heroic character that people could look up to. I have noticed with the animation so far they edited it to look more realistic. (this is what most movies like to go for, that feeling where you feel like you almost really were there, forgetting temporarily where you are.) So you feel like you could reach out and touch them when you are at the theatre. Part of this, I think, is making it more realistic. Now we found out months ago that the new team wants a totally different animation style. XD) These were some subtle details that I think, in my opinion, they added to make him look like the cute, innocent, and wimpy kid he was portrayed to be. Also, in the first HTTYD film they went with a very cartoon-styled way (mainly with vikings you could tell this.) You could tell by how big Hiccups eyes were, to make him look cute, and how thin his neck was. often when drawing child characters your drawing style is different. The reason I can think of for this would be. I've found myself to be a lot happier in the long-term that way. And honestly, I make it my policy to not put any potential stupid decision past writers, film makers, etc.
#Dragons 2 cloudjumper movie
Regarding concept art, I've typically found that when art depicts an actual scene, that scene does find its way into the movie in mostly accurate capacity. Nor, for that matter, is it even the same pose as any other picture of Cloudjumper that I have seen, in which case you could put the difference down to a simple yet bizarre edit.ģ. As for the outline, as I have mentioned, the four wings is the defining aspect of Cloudjumper's silhouette, and that background dragon has two. Facial expressions? That picture is nowhere near detailed enough or colourful enough to make out facial expressions on that background dragon. Yes, completely irrelevant to this discussionĢ. Cloudjumper is in the shot, but it is another dragon carrying Hiccup. Minor, off-topic correction: Cloudjumper is not carrying Hiccup in the 1:11 shot. How do you make a pair of dragon wings turn invisible? Dragon wings do not work that way. And frankly, I really hope that's what's going on, because otherwise the design makes no sense whatsoever. Its second set of wings could easily be down a bit further, and out of sight. The shot in 1:07 is not nearly good enough to get an accurate picture of Cloudjumper.
0 kommentar(er)
